Three little words so hard to say
Our science communication team here at Iowa State is having fun interviewing scientists about their communication challenges, as part of our NSF funded work to develop cases for teaching responsible communication of science.
Here’s one situation that’s come up a couple of times in our talks. A scientist is making a presentation to a public (non-specialist) audience. She’s asked a question relevant in a general way to her topic, but outside of her immediate research area. She remembers reading something about it, but isn’t quite sure of the answer. What should she say?
This problem is going to come up frequently in policy-relevant science. The “grand challenges” citizens and policy-makers want scientists to talk about are Big: Climate Change, Water, Renewable Fuels, Sustainability, Cybersecurity, Vaccination. The sciences have grown Big in response: inter/cross/transdisciplinary team/center/network endeavors. But every individual scientist is still small. In fact, the more successful the science is, the more focused her expertise is likely to be.
One way to bridge the gap between small and Big is to organize scientists into groups, like blue ribbon committees or the IPCC. But individual scientists are still going to get calls from the press, give talks to local groups, and help out at their community’s high school.
When she addresses such a public audience, the scientist in some sense represents Science. Her audience may not have other scientists on call, so if she fails to answer, they’re going to be left with whatever knowledge they had before. There’s also a question of how admitting ignorance is going to affect the scientist’s own credibility. What would it sound like to duck a question–especially if she has to duck virtually every question she’s asked?
On the other hand, it’s only candid for the scientist to admit the limits of her knowledge. Saying something that turns out to be wrong will do far more damage to her credibility than will admitting ignorance. And she’s not likely to be effective anyways, since one of the basic precepts of critical thinking is not to trust experts speaking outside the expertise.
The Red Green Show used to include a segment called “The Experts,” exploring the three little words men (and others) find it so hard to say: “I don’t know.”
Of course it should be easy to deny knowledge when asked about the taste of dino meat, as in this clip. It’s harder for a specialist in clouds giving a talk about climate change to say the three little words when asked about Hurricane Sandy or the midwest drought, but she probably should. So here’s the question: what should she say next?
[…] Goodwin is back blogging at Between Scientists & Citizens. She has a related article entitled Three little words so hard to say (I don’t know). […]
Should scientists promote results over process? | Climate Etc.
November 11, 2012 at 4:20 pm
[…] blog Scientists at Work is a good example of how scientists’ communication might focus on process, not results. I’ve been enjoying the current sequence about glaciers in Bhutan; each episode ends with […]
The cost of hidden metaphors « Between Scientists & Citizens
November 12, 2012 at 2:52 pm
[…] how the science works and, critically, listening to people’s concerns are the first steps. Communicating science responsibly and ethically, This is a step experts can take with family, friends, and their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has a positive impact on research and society. – USA News 24/7
October 18, 2023 at 4:07 pm
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society – Outlook First
October 18, 2023 at 5:21 pm
[…] and how science works and, above all, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step towards communicate science responsibly and ethically. It is a step that experts can take with family, friends and in their community. It is also very […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society – www.bigtechweekly.com
October 18, 2023 at 6:54 pm
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on ... - The Conversation - Deep Creek Lake Maryland
October 19, 2023 at 9:47 am
[…] and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society - Google Trending News
October 19, 2023 at 12:07 pm
[…] and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society - Inergency
October 20, 2023 at 12:51 am
[…] and how science will work and, critically, to hear to people’s issues is a first stage in responsibly and ethically speaking science. It is a stage industry experts can take with relatives, friends and in their communities. Working […]
Conversing about science and technological innovation has optimistic impacts on investigation and society – iWerd
October 20, 2023 at 1:47 am
[…] and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society - Phys.org - Deep Creek Lake Maryland
October 20, 2023 at 2:07 am
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on research and society – Technology And Society
October 23, 2023 at 12:29 am
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on ... - The Conversation Labari Afriq
October 26, 2023 at 11:16 pm
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking about science and technology has positive impacts on ... - The Conversation Indonesia Labari Afriq
October 28, 2023 at 4:24 am
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking About Science And Technology Has Positive Impacts On Research And Society – Technology And Society
October 30, 2023 at 1:45 am
[…] methods and how science works and, critically, to listen to people’s concerns is a first step in responsibly and ethically communicating science. It is a step experts can take with family, friends and in their communities. Working to support […]
Talking About Science And Technology Has Positive Impacts On Research And Society - Stuff South Africa - Stuff Magazines Labari Afriq
November 1, 2023 at 7:40 am
[…] is effective and, critically, to listen to people’s considerations is a very first move in responsibly and ethically speaking science. It is a move specialists can acquire with family, buddies and in their communities. Doing the job […]
Chatting about science and technological know-how has favourable impacts on investigation and culture - QuickNT Learn
November 28, 2023 at 5:23 pm